Timed up and Go (TUG) Test

BioPsychoSocial Assessment Tools for the Elderly - Assessment Summary Sheet

Method: Interview

Year: N/A

Domain: Biological, Psychological, or Social

Assessment Tool Category: Context-dependent

Variations/Translations: Focus groups

Setting: Any location

Method of Delivery: In person.

Description: An interview is a one-on-one discussion between an interviewer and the participant. It is defined as "a purposeful conversation in which one person asks prepared questions (interviewer) and another answers them (respondent)" This is done to gain information on a particular topic or a particular area to be researched. An interview is based on the assumption that it is possible to investigate issues by asking people to talk and to gather information by listening to and interpreting what they say and how they say it. There are several styles, including semi-structured, unstructured and in-depth. In-depth interviewing is the most commonly used interview method in qualitative research. Similar to a focus group, the interviewer will follow a thematic guide or question template. The use of open-ended questions allows the respondent to answer freely. Questions that follow are then entirely based on how the respondent’s answer leads the interview. There are no solid rules on how many participants to recruit, or how many interviews must be completed to reach saturation.

Scoring/Interpretation: Due to the varied nature of the responses, it is necessary to use the content analysis technique to analyse it. Coding and thematic analysis can be used.

Time to Administer: 1-2 hours

Availability: Available to anyone.

Software: NVIVO.

Website: N/A

Qualitative/Quantitative: Qualitative

Validity (Quantitative): N/A

Reliability (Quantitative): N/A

References:

Darlington, Y., & Scott, D., (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Stories from the field. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Comments: In unstructured interviews, freedom for the respondent to answer how they wish to, gives them a feeling of control in the interview situation. It may throw a completely different light on an issue that the interviewer had previously never considered.