Information regarding the Zoology 441a Final Exam

 

The exam is entirely in essay format. 

 

There are three sections:

Section A: short essays (5 marks each);

Section B: medium-length essays (15 marks each); and

Section C: one long essay (30 marks). 

 

There is choice available : please answer 8 of 11 questions from Section A; 2 of 4 questions from Section B; and 1 of 3 questions from Section C. 

 

Point form is acceptable for answers to questions in section A if it is clear and unambiguous.  Point form is not acceptable in answers to questions in sections B and C unless information is presented in a table. This information must be discussed in the body of the answer.

 

Total number of marks on the exam is 100.

 

As stated in the first class of the year, the first question on the exam will be:

 

  1. Briefly stated, what were Darwin’s two theses that formed his theory of evolution? What did the Modern Synthesis add to this theory? (5 marks)

 

You may still choose not to answer this question, but it’s a freebie…..

 

As you study for the exam, keep in mind the format.  You will be expected to demonstrate that you can integrate concepts and put them in context, rather than just memorize a lot of material.  Thus, I will not ask you for specific examples of organisms that were discussed in lecture (e.g. I will not ask you to describe how alarm calling in Belding’s ground squirrels illustrates the concept of kin selection).  However, I may ask a question about kin selection, and you may choose to include this example in your answer to illustrate your point….

 

You are not responsible for specific sections of the text.  The text is meant to provide background and clarification of concepts discussed in class.  Thus, material in the text that was not covered in class will not appear on the exam.

 

Papers presented in the tutorials are also not specifically tested on the exam.  However, you may choose to include information from these papers in your answers.

 

I have gone through the lecture topics and have tried to provide a context in which to consider these topics…. I hope you will find this helpful as you study.

 

1.  Darwin’s argument & tenets of the Modern Synthesis

            - why were Darwin’s ideas so revolutionary? Why was this a different way of looking at the

                        diversity of life?

 

2.  Analysis of adaptation:  remember natural selection is not the only explanation for patterns of evolution, but it is the only explanation for adaptation!

- importance of the comparative method (and accurate phylogenies) to 

analysis of adaptation

- why has the adaptive advantage of sexual reproduction been difficult to

 demonstrate?

            - how can skewed sex ratios be considered adaptive?

 

3.   sexual selection:

- how does it differ from natural selection? How can it be considered to be

            a “special case” of natural selection?

- what are some of the prevailing hypotheses?

 

4.  group and kin selection:

            - invoked in cases where the adaptive advantage of a trait is not obvious

                        when examining the benefit to an individual (e.g. reproductive

                        restraint)

            - therefore, the central question is: who benefits from an adaptation?

 

5.  theadaptationist programme: an approach to evolutionary biology that is not shared by all evolutionary biologists!

            - criticisms of the adaptationists programme – is it circular?

            - are all traits adaptive (note: I said all traits, not all adaptations)?  Are there non-adaptive

                        explanations for some traits?

            - what are some of the constraints on adaptation?  Why are species not

                        necessarily “optimally designed”?

 

6.  evolution and classification: why construct phylogenies at all?  What is inferred in a phylogeny (e.g. similarity indicates close descent relationships)

            - what are anagenesis and cladogenesis?  How do they interact to

                        produce the characters seen in a group of related organisms?

            - how do the types of characters used in constructing a phylogeny affect

                        the inferred relationships among organisms?  What leads us to

                        make mistakes in constructing phylogenies (e.g. convergent evolution, mosaic evolution etc.)?

            - how do phenetecists and cladists approach the construction of

                        phylogenies differently, and what are the results?

            - The concept of a species is a fundamental assumption in our attempt to

                         describe the history of evolution.  Why then is it such a slippery

                        concept?

            - we know that characters shared by two organisms may represent

                        characters shared by descent (inheritance) or because they have

                        been acquired independently by natural selection (similar

                        adaptations resulting in convergence).  It’s obvious we need to

                         distinguish between these two categories, but how do we do it?

            - technical considerations: outgroup analysis, the principle of parsimony,

                        use of molecular data, molecular clocks etc.

 

7.   speciation: we assume that life on earth diversified through the process of speciation (that is, an interbreeding group eventually  becomes two or more isolated groups, which in time, become something different from the ancestral group).  Thus, the process of speciation is at the heart of our understanding of evolution as a process of diversification.

            - what are some of the proposed models of speciation?

 

8.   biogeography: the diversification of life on earth has not occurred in a vacuum, but in space and time.  Thus, processes such as continental drift, climate change, colonization of new land masses etc. have contributed to the pattern of cladogenesis (speciation) in evolutionary time.  Furthermore, ecological considerations such as dispersal, competition, availability of niches etc. have also shaped the distribution of organisms.

            - How do organisms expand their range?  Why do some organisms have

                         restricted ranges while others are distributed around the world? What is an adaptive

                        radiation?

            - how can we use information about geological and geographical history to

                        reconstruct the pattern of speciation in a particular taxon?

            - why are some areas species-rich while others are species-poor?

 

9.  rates of evolutionary change: again, evolution has a historical pattern in time.  We know that some groups have diversified much more than other groups, and that individual taxa have changed considerably while others are relatively unchanged from their fossil ancestors.

            - what are the differences between taxonomic and phylogenetic rates of

                        evolution?  How does an incomplete fossil record affect

                        interpretations of these processes?

            - how do we analyze rates of change in single characters?

 

10.  Punctuated equilibrium and phyletic gradualism:  The process of evolution can be viewed at a range of spatial and temporal scales.  At one end of the scale, we know that natural selection acting on allele frequencies at each generation results in changes in populations.  However, we know that through time evolution has also produced such radically diverse organism as bacteria, blue whales, Tyrannosaurus rex and pine trees.  Evolutionary biologists differ in their views about the how the processes resulting in microevolutionary changes are related to the processes that result in macroevolutionary changes.  This has led to different interpretations of the fossil record, but more fundamentally, signifies a difference in view about what a species really means  It’s easy to caricature extreme positions at either end of the spectrum (everything comes down to the selection of one allele over another vs. there is no change without speciation), but without resorting to mud-slinging, there is an important and vigorous debate about the processes that have written and continue to write the history of evolution….

 

11.  morphological change in macroevolution:  Often, we see dramatic changes in morphology among closely related species (often, we don’t but that’s another question for you to think about)…  Up till now, we have not considered how these changes might occur at a physiological and/or genetic level.  Here we consider the processes that can give rise to major morphological changes in a lineage…

            - consider the importance of allometry in understanding the appearance of

                         new features

            - what kinds of features are more likely to change than others? This

                        hearkens back to the concept of constraints on adaptation (topic 5 in this list)

            - what are the different processes involved (i.e. heterochrony: types of

                        peramorphosis and paedomorphosis)

            - what is the genetic basis of these types of changes

 

12. coevolution:  Now we consider the types of interactions among species that can lead to evolutionary change.

            - consider the ways in which species can interact and the ways in

                        which these interactions pose adaptive challenges

            - can these interactions lead to extinction?  How?  What kinds of patterns

                         may emerge?

 

13.  mass extinctions:  Be familiar with the major mass extinction events, but put them into context of the rest of the material in the course.  What happens during mass extinctions?  What causes them? How are they different from background extinctions? Can we tell them apart?  What happens after a mass extinction?  Do some species do better than others during a mass extinction? Why?

 

Good luck with your studying and feel free to contact me if you have questions….