Employers gain e-snoop powers
Tuesday, 24 October, 2000, 01:12 GMT
URL: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_987000/987557.stm
Workers may find their surfing habits under scrutiny
New regulations giving employers sweeping
powers to monitor their workers' e-mails and
internet activity come into force on Tuesday.
But campaigners say the rules, under the new
Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, are an
assault on personal privacy.
Under the regulations, employers can legally
monitor staff phone calls, e-mails and internet
activity without consent, for a wide range of
reasons.
They can intercept
communications to
protect against
computer viruses, to
monitor how staff deal
with customers, and to
ensure workers are not
using the internet to
access offensive
material.
When the government first proposed new
regulations, the business community
complained that they were far too restrictive.
After fierce lobbying, employers were given
wider powers, and the unions warned that
privacy was under threat.
There is also concern
that the rules conflict
with a new Data
Protection Code, which
threatens employers
with unlimited fines if
they read private
e-mails.
Monitoring staff is not new. Until the advent of
automated telephone systems, company
switchboard operators would often check on
the first few moments of a phone
conversation.
But modern communications systems mean
information is streaming in and out of
businesses at the click of a mouse.
Software, which can help bosses keep an eye
on it all, is now a multi-million pound industry.
Steve Donovan, a director of Armstrong
Communications in Salford, can use one such
application to monitor what each of his 20
staff is doing on the internet.
His staff can be online quite legitimately for
several hours a day.
They all know that their boss keeps an eye on
their internet traffic and e-mail - and that he
is happy for them to use the net occasionally
for personal reasons.
Right to privacy
Mr Donovan says he has to know what is
happening online to protect his business.
"Do I spend 90 percent of my time looking at
my PC, checking up on my staff? No, I'm too
busy," he told the BBC.
"But if I wish to know if I've got a problem with
a member of my staff, it means I can go back
and check what they were doing online.
"If I need to discipline someone, I need to
know all the facts if I'm going to do it
competently."
The government has said the new regulations
are aimed at allowing businesses to get the
most out of the new communications
technology.
But many campaigners believe they directly
contravene the Human Rights and Data
Protection Acts, which state individuals have a
right to privacy at work.
Draft guidelines issued by the Data Protection
Commissioner also question whether blanket
monitoring can be justified, and stress that
employees have a right to work without
constantly being monitored.
Privacy campaigners like Simon Davies of
Privacy International have said confusion over
these issues could lead employers to behave
illegally, and that the government's stance is
wrong.
"Today is a bleak day for privacy in Britain," he
said. "It signals that rather than moving
forward to establish human dignity and
autonomy, we're actually creating more
systems of control.
"I think it's very important that people
recognise that, and that employees make sure
they use whatever mechanisms they've got to
protect what rights they have left."
The government has said employers must
strike a balance between privacy and
surveillance, but there is little doubt that
unscrupulous employers could abuse the rules.