URL: http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/DynaPage.taf?file=/nature/journal/v409/n6820/full/409547b0_fs.html
Date accessed: 25 February 2001
Nature 409, 547 (2001) © Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
01 February 2001
MATTHEW DAVIS
[WASHINGTON] Tighter controls for US-funded medical
research involving human subjects in the developing world were announced last
week by the US Department of Health and Human Services. In response to growing concerns — from both the press and scientific
advisory groups — over ethical standards for clinical trials in developing
countries, the department has set up an Office of International Activities. The new division, to be located within the Office for Human Research
Protections (OHRP), will oversee, but not regulate, federally funded trials in
developing countries and provide ethical guidance. The OHRP already regulates federally funded scientists working abroad,
although research by drug companies is controlled by the Food and Drug
Administration. A recent series of articles in The Washington Post, criticizing the
way US researchers operate in developing countries, depicted large
pharmaceutical companies — and some federally funded researchers — as
increasingly exploiting vulnerable patient populations in poor countries. For example, Pfizer was criticized for a 1996 clinical trial in Nigeria, in
which its antibiotic trovafloxacin was tested on children and infants with
meningitis. The Washington Post portrayed the company as taking advantage
of a meningitis epidemic, but Pfizer rejected the charges, saying that the trial
played "an important role in investigating a potential breakthrough in oral
therapy for this terrible epidemic". The Washington Post articles have prompted calls for a congressional
health panel to seek hearings on the issue, and "a legislative
response". The issue is also being driven by the National Bioethics Advisory Commission
and the World Medical Association, which had intensified their involvement
before the newspaper series began. The organizations were spurred into action partly by complaints that began
three years ago over a Ugandan clinical trial in which HIV-positive pregnant
women were given placebos even though, critics claimed, a proven therapy was
available that could have saved the unborn child from infection. The two organizations advise scientists not to use placebos in developing
countries when effective treatments exist. But critics argue that without a
placebo group it is often impossible to gauge the effectiveness of a new
therapy.
Category: 4. Ethical and Social Concerns Arising out of Biotechnology