Government urged 'to listen' to experts
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_992000/992743.stm
Thursday, 26 October, 2000, 16:14 GMT 17:14 UK
Cattle first showed signs of BSE in the mid-1980s
British scientists have called for changes to
the government's handling of scientific advice
following the report into the BSE crisis.
The inquiry highlighted problems with the UK's
policy on dealing with advice from expert
committees and criticised the lack of
co-ordination of research policy between
government departments.
Dr Peter Cotgreave of the Save British Science
Society said: "The inquiry has stated quite
clearly that scientific experts have not been
given the independence to state their views.
"There will have to be changes to the way
scientific advice is dealt with in government.
"The inquiry says government experts should
be able to publish their advice.
"If that had happened over BSE, it would have
prevented the outrageous situation in which
political interference from officials at the
Ministry of Agriculture allowed them to overrule
the Chief Medical Officer on what he was
permitted to tell government ministers.
Research cuts
Dr Cotgreave also noted the report's criticism
of the lack of co-ordination between different
government departments over research policy.
"The left hand neither knows nor cares what
the right hand is doing," he said.
"Over the last decade and a half, we've seen
the bizarre spectacle of the Ministry of
Agriculture cutting its research budget in the
face of a whole host of problems, of which BSE
is just one.
"This culture of treating scientists as second
class citizens, and of failing to listen to their
advice, must stop."
The BSE inquiry
spanned two and a half
years and cost £27m.
The 16-volume report
included a long section
on lessons learned from
the affair.
The report said the
next time a disease
was identified which
might potentially pass
from animals to
humans, a
comprehensive review
of all the possible infection pathways should be
undertaken.
This would include all relevant government
departments and draw on whatever outside
help might be necessary.
In the case of all health scares a "policy of
openness" was the correct approach, the
report concluded.
'Culture of secrecy'
Scientists have spoken of a "culture of
secrecy" over BSE where experts couldn't
pursue their research into the disease.
Ian McGill, a former research scientist at the
Ministry of Agriculture, told the BBC: "There
seemed to be a culture that there were certain
questions that just weren't allowed to be
asked and you weren't allowed to pursue those
lines of research.
"The scientists that I was working with were
trying to get the research done and get the
work published, but they were, you know,
fighting a culture of not doing it."
'Research was prevented'
Dr Stephen Dealler, a medical microbiologist
who presented evidence to the BSE inquiry,
said scientists such as himself trying to sound
the alert were "just not listened to".
Dr Dealler told the BBC: "What happened was a
lot of research was prevented, a lot of
publications were prevented, and a lot of
research took place actually inside the Ministry
of Agriculture.
"It was very, very difficult for this data to get
out to people outside.
It has emerged during the inquiry that in the
early days of BSE, vital research was delayed
because of rivalries between the Ministry of
Agriculture's veterinary laboratory and another
government unit in Edinburgh specialising in
brain diseases.
And when expert scientific committees were
finally set up to advise on what action to take,
officials and ministers left the public with
confused messages about their conclusions.