URL: http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/DynaPage.taf?file=/nature/journal/v409/n6816/full/409005b0_fs.html
Date accessed: 11 February 2001
Nature 409, 5 (2001) © Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
DAVID DICKSON
[LONDON] British scientists reacted with surprise and
relief to a substantial vote of confidence from the House of Commons — the
lower house of the UK parliament — over the use of human embryos for research
into therapies for serious diseases. Members of Parliament (MPs) agreed by 366 to 174 on 19 December to approve
changes to the Human Fertilization and Embryology Act of 1990 allowing such
research to take place. "I was very surprised; we were expecting it to be much closer,"
says Austin Smith, director of the Centre for Genome Research at the University
of Edinburgh, who already holds a licence for carrying out research on human
embryos up to 14 days old as permitted by the 1990 act — but is currently
restricted to work that is directed at problems of infertility. Smith, one of the leading UK investigators in stem-cell research, says that a
change in the regulations would not have any short-term impact on his research,
apart from enabling him to obtain a broader licence. But it would make it
possible for him to start work towards potential therapies, perhaps in
neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease. The proposed change in the legislation had been strongly opposed both by
anti-abortion groups and prominent Roman Catholic leaders. Other opponents
warned that the interest on obtaining stem cells from human embryos represents
the beginning of a "slippery slope" towards human cloning. Such arguments had been countered by a vigorous lobbying campaign by the
scientific and medical establishment, with MPs being given briefings by, among
others, the Royal Society, the Wellcome Trust and the Nuffield Council on
Bioethics. The objections were also rejected last summer by a panel set up under
the government's chief medical officer, Liam Donaldson (see Nature
406, 815; 2000).
Supporting stem cells: Aberdeen MP Anne Begg told of her battle
against degenerative disease. The proposed change will next be debated in the House of Lords on 16 January,
but, given the size of the Commons majority, researchers are optimistic that the
Lords might not reject the measure.
But the most telling contributions to the debate perhaps came from several MPs
who told of their personal battles with illness, including Anne Begg (Labour,
Aberdeen South) who suffers from a degenerative brittle-bone disease and is
confined to a wheelchair.
PA
Category: 31. Stem Cells