Scientists fear new guidelines will stifle basic research
URL: http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/DynaPage.taf?file=/nature/journal/v412/n6845/full/412364b0_fs.html
Date accessed: 9 October 2001
|
|
|
Nature 412, 364 (2001) © Macmillan Publishers Ltd. |
|
Scientists fear new guidelines will stifle basic research
DAVID CYRANOSKI
[TOKYO]
MICHAEL
EVANS/GETTY IMAGES |
Koizumi: faced
with protests. |
Science-policy guidelines issued by Japanese
prime minister Junichiro Koizumi have ignited a fire-storm of protest among the
country's leading researchers.
The scientists are upset because they say the
guidelines, which strongly emphasize the economic value of research and
development, don't provide strong enough support for basic scientific research.
The guidelines were issued on 11 July by the
Council for Science and Technology Policy, the top science-policy-making body in
the government, which Koizumi chairs. They call for a strategic focus on four
key areas of research — life sciences, information technology, environmental
research and nanotechnology — and the reform of Japan's science and technology
system to build industrial competitiveness, a vigorous economy, better health
care and a safe environment.
But 18 former and existing heads of some of
the country's leading research institutes wrote an open letter to Koizumi,
stating that the guidelines will stifle basic research by "completely
mobilizing science and technology to meet short-term goals aimed primarily at
industrial competitiveness".
According to Yoshiki Hotta, director of the
National Institute of Genetics, who helped to draft the letter, researchers
outside the specified fields will either lose support or "do their work
under the cover of some other project that fits the government specifications.
There's no clear allocation for basic science in the guidelines, and this is
dangerous," he says.
A senior researcher at Tokyo University's
medical school, who declined to be named, added that the guidelines "will
lead to demoralization of scientists, as they keep running after whatever goal
is set by the government".
The letter earned its authors a 15-minute
audience with Koji Omi, a cabinet-level minister for science and technology
policy, who told them that the guidelines make sufficient allowance for basic
research. The guidelines state that Japan should "achieve
international-class, high-quality basic research that will clear a path to the
future". But critics say such words merely pay lip-service to the problem.
Hotta says that the group wrote the open
letter — a dramatic gesture by Japanese standards — because there is no
proper channel for scientists to give their opinions to the government. Many
researchers criticize the Council for Science and Technology Policy for failing
to represent their views. The council is composed mostly of ministers and
industry representatives, and researchers say that the three academic scientists
on it have limited influence.
Some industrialists echo the scientists'
complaints. The government has "no clear understanding of what the best
research is — and yet they want to move on to application," says Toshiaki
Ikoma, president of Texas Instruments in Japan.
Nature
© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2001 Registered No. 785998 England.
Categories: 16. Economics and Biotechnology, 39. General Issues about Research