Stem-cell work in the balance

URL: http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/DynaPage.taf?file=/nature/journal/v408/n6815/full/408887b0_fs.html

Date accessed: 06 February 2001

Nature 408, 887 - 888 (2000) © Macmillan Publishers Ltd.

nature 21/28th December 2000

MATTHEW DAVIS

[WASHINGTON] Conventional wisdom has it that George W. Bush's presidency could doom US researchers' efforts to obtain federal funding for work using human embryonic stem cells. But supporters of the research are optimistic that the new administration will at least review the issue before acting.

"We're very hopeful that the Bush administration will not restrict stem-cell research, and we will work toward that end," says Tim Leshan, director of public policy at the American Society for Cell Biology.

During the presidential campaign, Bush's aides indicated that he would halt the National Institutes of Health (NIH) initiative to support the research. Although it was launched almost two years ago, this initiative has yet to fund any stem-cell research.

But supporters of the research think that neither Bush nor his closest advisers have yet given the debate much thought. They note that statements from Bush aides indicating his opposition to the NIH effort came in response to questions from a reporter, and were not official policy. And they are advising researchers to avoid a confrontational stance with the new administration, so as not to drive Bush into appeasing the opponents of embryo research.

The current NIH regime is still setting up a stem-cell research programme. This effort is rooted in a legal opinion, crafted under President Bill Clinton's administration, that says the US government can fund research with stem cells derived from human embryos, despite the agency being prohibited by law from supporting work with the embryos themselves. This opinion — which even some researchers think is shaky — would take little executive action to reverse.

 
NEWSMAKERS

Loss of support: stem-cell advocate Arlen Specter will lose reign over NIH budget.

Advocates of stem-cell research are worried that Bush could overturn the ruling without having to cut off funding for any research already underway. Rather, the administration could avoid the political heat that would come from ending the programme outright by requesting additional reviews that would, in effect, delay funding indefinitely.

Even if the current policy remained intact, NIH officials do not anticipate approving any embryonic stem-cell research until May at the earliest. The deadline for the first round of applications is 15 March.

People familiar with the process say that a key hold-up is the lack of embryonic stem-cell lines that comply with NIH guidelines. The NIH is also still vetting members of its new Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Review Group, which will review all funding requests.

Meanwhile, the expected departure of Senator Arlen Specter (Republican, Pennsylvania), the most active supporter of stem-cell research in the US Congress, from the chairmanship of the appropriations panel overseeing the NIH budget, could further weaken the chances of obtaining federal funds.


Macmillan MagazinesNature © Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2000 Registered No. 785998 England.

Category: 31. Stem Cells