The Biotechnology Job Outlook in Canada
Date accessed: 15 June 2001
Nature Biotechnology
Careers
and Recruitment May 2001 Volume 19 Number 5 pp 489 - 490 The biotechnology job outlook in Canada Paul Watson Paul Watson is the communications manager at the Biotechnology Human Resource Council, 401-116 Lisgar Street, Ottawa, ON K2P 0C2, Canada (e-mail: paul@bhrc.ca). Biotech jobs are on the rise, thanks to a strong science base and the maturation of the industry. The Canadian biotechnology industry has experienced solid growth over the past few years, with sales of well over US $1 billion and R&D expenditures of over $600 million1. Canada and the United Kingdom are in a virtual tie for second place in biotechnology, with the United States being the dominant force worldwide. The success of firms such as BioChem Pharma, Aventis Pasteur, and QLT Phototherapeutics has served to propel the industry forward, paving the road for the country's 350 core biotech companies. This success has translated into considerable growth in job opportunities. Employment estimates indicate that 16,000 workers are directly employed in biotechnology, with most activity taking place around several biotech clusters across the country, including Saskatoon, Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver.
|
One of the key factors in the growth of the Canadian biotech sector is the continued availability of human resources. Although there is a net flow of biotech talent toward the United States, Canada's liberal immigration policy allows for a net influx of skilled workers2. However, limited resources in key areas such as executive management, regulatory affairs, and leading-edge scientific disciplines such as bioinformatics may pose a growing challenge if adequate steps are not taken to build further capacity to meet industry needs. The loss of existing and potential skilled Canadian workers to the United States has also contributed to upward salary pressures, particularly for more senior positions and in areas of leading-edge science. "With more money available, companies are building the human resources infrastructure needed to take them through the next stages of growth," says René Douville, vice president at Royal Bank Ventures. "We could soon experience a sharper human resources crunch for people with experience in clinical trials, regulatory affairs, marketing, and distribution." The average size of Canadian biotech companies remains small, with well over half of companies comprising fewer than 50 employees. The relatively small size of firms affords employees the opportunity to exercise creativity and engage in a variety of activities, developing a range of experience that becomes more difficult as companies grow and tasks become more highly segmented and differentiated. The flip side of this coin is that smaller companies often have fewer financial resources at their disposal, which means that they must remain focused on a narrower range of activities in order to manage growth responsibly and minimize the time required to bring their products to market. A growing sector |
The Canadian attraction Recent federal budget surpluses in Canada spell good news for R&D in Canada, as the federal government has expressed a commitment to knowledge-based industries, which are expected to fuel economic growth in the new economy. R&D tax incentives and direct investment in research activities will likely continue to be the main instruments at the government's disposal. Money invested in Genome Canada, for example, is paying dividends in spinoff economic activity, in much the same way as US collaborations associated with the Human Genome Project. A Canadian government study3 of human resources in the biotechnology sector predicts that the rapid evolution of the biotech sector will continue to fuel job growth. Statistics gathered through the Canadian Biotech Job Bank show a marked increase of Internet job postings throughout the past year, with 66% of jobs falling in the category of research and development. Of these R&D jobs, 42% were for staff-level research scientists and 18% were for senior scientists, group leaders, and managers. The most common scientific disciplines being sought were in the field of biology (including general biology, microbiology, molecular biology, and other specific biological fields) followed closely by chemistry (general, analytical, organic, and other specializations). Demographic trends are affecting Canada's labor landscape in much the same way as the United States, with members of Generation X entering the workforce in increasing numbers and baby boomers populating the majority of senior positions. A paradigm shift is taking place in the workplace, particularly where top performers are concerned. "These people generally want to work in an environment where they feel they are being recognized and rewarded for their efforts," says Susan Layman, vice president of human resources for Hoffmann–La Roche. "They want to have an impact. They want to be involved in decision making. CEOs need to recognize and understand the range of motivation factors that drive top performers. Then they must turn their attention to nurturing a performance management culture that fosters continual dialog and creates the right environment for business and personal success factors to coincide." Interestingly, many human resources experts concur that money does not figure among the top job motivators for scientific staff. The chance to do cutting-edge science alongside talented like-minded individuals is more important than salary considerations once remuneration needs are being reasonably met. Feedback from scientists commonly underscores the need for a stimulating work environment that has enough built-in flexibility to allow room for creativity and innovation. "The biggest draw is the love of science," says Mary Yaroshevsky, director of human resources for Vancouver-based Inflazyme Pharmaceuticals. "If a company is working on an exciting leading-edge technology, job satisfaction is usually very high. People are motivated by the possibility of discovering a new technology that will help alleviate human suffering." Conclusions |
REFERENCES
|
Category: 16. Economics and Biotechnology