MIT 144F: Week11
Research Styles: Study notes prompted by the Hult (1995) Article
General Process of Research:
Preparation:
-
growing awareness that a problem exists
-
defining the problem in many different ways to frame the problem
-
intuitions and prior experience can play an important role
Incubation:
-
indistinct, subconscious "mulling over" of the problem
-
found to be very important
-
having enough time for process to occur can be crucial
Illumination:
-
having an imaginative breakthrough
-
formulating formal hypotheses
-
clarifying one's understanding of the problem
Verification (see disclaimer):
-
testing the hypotheses
-
formal laboratory experiment(s)
-
informal check(s) against prior experience
-
field work, statistical explorations (social sciences)
-
examination of primary and secondary texts (humanities)
-
not matter the discipline, hypotheses will be criticized by members of
the discipline
-
revising hypotheses in light of contradictions crucial
Downie's Disclaimer:
I do not agree with this author that the role of research is to "verify"
one's hypotheses. One can never truly "verify" a theory. All research findings
and the theories we generate to explain them are best thought of as being
tentative. The idea of "falsifiability" is important here. Simply put,
one creates hypotheses that can be proven wrong (not correct) based upon
some prediction. In general, if the prediction is shown to be wrong then
theory is discarded or revised; if it shown to be correct, the theory is
retained but not considered "proven." New predictions are made and then
tested again until such time as the theory fails. Overall, the purpose
of experimentation is to "disprove" not "prove."
Important Features of Scientific Enquiry:
Primary question:
"How well do current therories actually explain the natural and physical
world as we know it and observe it?"
Primary research style:
-
formal hypotheses are formulated then tested
Two important issues:
validity
-
does the experiment measure what it claims to measure?
reliabilty
-
can the experiment be replicated by others and similar results found?
Important features of Social Science Enquiry:
Primary goal:
"...the systematic study of human behavior and human societies."
Research styles:
-
some fields adopt a strongly scientific approach (e.g. psychology)
-
some fields adopt a more humanistic approach in combination with observation
of subjects (e.g.. sociology)
-
observation is combined with personal insight and experience, tends to
be more descriptive
Important Issues:
Subjectivity/Objectivity
-
difficult for social scientist to remove personal experiences, biases from
their interpretations of human behaviour
Ethical Considerations
-
ties in with above: use of human subjects without consent is an ethical
mine-field. However, gaining informed consent can induce the Hawthorne
Effect.
Important features of Enquiry in the Humanities:
Primary goal:
"..the exploration and explanation of the human experience."
Research styles:
-
strong reliance on text (broadly defined)
-
creative writing (literature, poetry, and drama, etc.)
-
interpretative writing (literary and art criticism, etc.)
-
theoretical writing (historical and social theories of literature and art,
etc.)
Acceptable Evidence:
-
rarely any absolute proof
-
informed personal insights, imagination and experience considered valid
-
"theories" valid if found to be consistent and helpful (rarely formally
tested).
-
in general, research is validated in a more "holistic" manner than science
and social science research
Page creator: J. Stephen Downie
Page created: 17 November 1997
Page updated: 18 November 1997